Novak Djokovic Loses Legal Fight To Avoid Deportation From Australia

Novak Djokovic misplaced his closing bid to keep away from deportation from Australia on Sunday, ending a sensational 11-day battle over his Covid-19 vaccination standing and dashing his dream of a report twenty first Grand Slam. In just a few dry phrases, the chief justice of Australia’s Federal Court docket, James Allsop, Sunday allotted with the unvaccinated tennis celebrity’s try and reinstate his cancelled visa. “The orders of the courtroom are that the amended utility be dismissed with prices”, Allsop mentioned saying the unanimous choice, on the eve of the primary matches on the Australian Open.

The 34-year-old defending champion and prime seed had been scheduled to play within the night of the primary day. If he had retained the title he would develop into the primary males’s tennis participant in historical past to win 21 Grand Slams.

As an alternative, the overtly anti-Covid vaccine tennis celebrity is now set to be stored in detention pending a fast flight out of Australia.

Three Federal Court docket justices had listened to a half-day of feisty authorized back-and-forth about Djokovic’s alleged threat to public order in Australia.

Immigration Minister Alex Hawke mentioned Djokovic’s stance could encourage anti-vaccine sentiment, main some individuals to face the pandemic with out vaccination and galvanizing anti-vaxxer activists to collect in protests and rallies.

The participant’s high-powered authorized staff had painted Australia’s effort to deport him as “irrational” and “unreasonable”, however at instances they confronted pointed questions from the panel of three justices who will now determine the case.

His lawyer Nick Wooden sought to systematically dismantle the federal government’s central argument.

Regardless of the Serbian star being unvaccinated, Wooden insisted his shopper had not courted anti-vaxxer assist and was not related to the motion.

The federal government “does not know what Mr Djokovic’s present views are”, Wooden insisted.

Djokovic has spent a lot of the final week in immigration detention, along with his visa twice being revoked by the federal government over his refusal to get a Covid-19 vaccine earlier than arrival — a requirement for many guests.

Authorities lawyer Stephen Lloyd mentioned the actual fact Djokovic was not vaccinated two years into the pandemic and had repeatedly ignored security measures — together with failing to isolate whereas Covid-19 constructive — was proof sufficient of his anti-vaccine views.

“He has now develop into an icon for the anti-vaccination teams,” Lloyd mentioned. “Rightly or wrongly he’s perceived to endorse an anti-vaccination view and his presence right here is seen to contribute to that.”

In a written submission the federal government additionally identified that Djokovic selected to not give proof on the listening to.

“He might set the report straight if it wanted correcting. He has not — that has vital penalties.”

‘We stand by you’

Due to the format of the courtroom, the justices’ choice can be extraordinarily tough to enchantment by both facet.

In addition to instant deportation, the Serbian star additionally faces a three-year ban from Australia.

Scott Morrison’s authorities had tried and did not take away Djokovic as soon as earlier than — on the grounds he was unvaccinated and {that a} latest Covid an infection was not ample for a medical exemption.

A decrease circuit courtroom decide dominated that officers at Melbourne airport made procedural errors when cancelling his visa.

For just a few days, Djokovic was free to coach earlier than a second visa revocation and a return to a infamous Melbourne immigration detention facility.

Many Australians — who’ve suffered extended lockdowns and border restrictions — consider the participant gamed the system to dodge vaccine entry necessities.

The case has been seized on by tradition warriors within the roiling debate over vaccines and learn how to deal with the pandemic.

Australia’s immigration minister has admitted that Djokovic is at “negligible” threat of infecting Australians, however argued his previous “disregard” for Covid-19 laws could pose a threat to public well being and encourage individuals to disregard pandemic guidelines.

The tennis ace contracted Covid-19 in mid-December and, in response to his personal account, did not isolate regardless of realizing he was constructive.

Public information present he attended a stamp unveiling, a youth tennis occasion, and granted a media interview across the time he obtained examined and his newest an infection was confirmed.

Djokovic is tied with Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal with 20 Grand Slam titles every.

Spanish nice Nadal took a swipe at his rival on Saturday as gamers complained the scandal was overshadowing the opening Grand Slam of the yr.


“The Australian Open is rather more vital than any participant,” Nadal instructed reporters at Melbourne Park.

“The Australian Open can be an ideal Australian Open with or with out him.”

Matters talked about on this article

Related posts

China has won AI battle with U.S., Pentagon’s ex-software chief says


Nancy Pelosi briefly forgets Donald Trump’s name on CNN’s ‘State of the Union’


Google and Tech Rivals Tap Cash Reserves to Realize Cloud Ambitions


Leave a Comment